![]() ![]() The forgotten boyfriend gag was horrible. A patchy, putrid follow-up full of fake smiles, frivolous subplots and meaningless monologues, watching it was like listening to your favourite band play their biggest hits on broken instruments. Memorably subtitled A Year in the Life because that’s how long it’ll take you to get over it, the Gilmore Girls comeback was a bit of a disaster. ![]() For the most part, however, Peele’s show was considerably short on both fun and frights. The new Twilight Zone wasn’t entirely unlovable, and it at least remembered to equip itself with some tantalising concepts (the episode about the murderous stand-up comic was terrific) and excellent guest actors (Kumail Nanjiani and Chris O’Dowd included). Some of us were delighted to hear that Hollywood scaremaster Jordan Peele had been handed the reins for a new era of the Rod Serling horror anthology. He died following a short illness in 2021. Apparently, the actor’s tell-all memoir had soured relations with his former castmates. Oh, and Dustin Diamond (Screech) was not invited to the reunion. Nice ideas, but this decidedly average remix struggled to find an audience. Meanwhile, the awesome Lisa Turtle (Lark Voorhies) had forged a successful career in fashion design. Somehow, Zack Morris (Mark-Paul Gosselaar) became Governor of California (no, really) with Kelly Kapowski (Tiffani Thiessen) as his first lady. Jessie Spano (Elizabeth Berkley) showed up as a school counsellor. An ageless Mario Lopez returned as AC Slater, handsome PE teacher. What, you may ask, happened to the spark, the chemistry, the nail-biting intrigue? Beats me, and this largely laborious comeback lost the run of itself with pointless plotlines and trivial twists.Ī clunky contemporary twist on a ’90s favourite, Saved by the Bell 2.0 presented a reimagined Bayside High in which the savvy, sarky kids of yesteryear continue to rule th e roost. ![]() Series creator Chris Carter worked hard - a little too hard - to craft another round of paranormal shenanigans with everyone’s favourite cynical Feds. David Duchovny returned as Mulder, Gillian Anderson as Scully. “The truth is still out there.” But is it, really? You’d be hard pressed to find a single person who cared much for this sloppy, unnecessary revival. Gillian Anderson as Scully and David Duchovny as Mulder in The X-Files reboot (2016-2018) ![]() Apologies were later issued, and Netflix cancelled the rest of the press tour. Let’s just say that it involved an argument over Jeffrey Tambor’s on-set behaviour - the actor been accused of verbally harassing co-star Jessica Walter - and that some of his male colleagues jumped to his defence during the interview. It took five years, then, for a wobbly fifth to arrive, but not before the New York Times conducted the mother of all cast interviews. Clumsy, clueless and regrettably convoluted, season four struggled to find its mojo, and a heavily recut version with added voiceover by Ron Howard proved heavily popular. Did any of us enjoy the new Dallas? Did we really need more Will & Grace? What was the point, exactly, of that peculiar Prison Break sequel, and is it ever a good idea to bring a hit television series back from the dead? Let’s examine the evidence.Īrrested Development (first run 2003-2006 revival 2013-2019)Ĭanned in its prime after three seasons at Fox, Mitchell Hurwitz’s award-winning family sitcom found a new home at Netflix in 2013. History is littered with telly comebacks that, though occasionally spun from good intentions (see the so-so Cold Feet continuation, for instance), usually fell short of the mark. John Cleese’s revival of Fawlty Towers is a terrible idea and looks more like an act of revenge ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |